In general, there has been a shared vision among public land managers
in the south Denali region that the south side of Denali should
receive greater use and development for visitors. However, the issues
related to such development have historically generated extensive
public controversy.
The ‘60s and ‘70s: Parks Highway Proposals
In 1968 the U.S. and Alaska Departments of Commerce proposed a facility
at Chulitna Pass. That was followed by a 1969 proposal by the National
Park Service and the Alaska Division of Tourism for a facility on
South Curry Ridge (NPS 1969). The location at Chulitna, which is
only 70 miles from the main entrance of Denali National Park, and
lack of existing infrastructure at both sites made these projects
unappealing to many people. Neither proposal materialized, though
the designation of Denali State Park in 1970 was intended to provide
the land base and protections needed for a major public tourism
facility (Cresap, McCormick, and Paget; 1968).
In 1974 Alaska State Parks proposed a lodge, visitor center,
park headquarters, and a downhill ski area at Byers Lake (Alaska
State Parks, 1974 and 1975). This project was actually let out
for competitive proposals and a contract was awarded; however,
the successful bidder never seriously pursued the project.
The ‘70s: Peters Hills Proposals
The concept of locating recreation facilities in the Peters Hills
emerged from a study undertaken by the state in 1970 to explore
ways to increase the role of tourism in the Alaskan economy. One
of the study recommendations was the construction of a hotel in
the south Denali area. Bradford Washburn, the director of the
Boston Museum of Science and world renown Mount McKinley cartographer
and photographer, recommended that visitor facilities be constructed
at a site south of the Tokositna River (Environmental Investigation
and Site Analysis – Tokositna, Denali State Park, 1980).
In 1972, U.S. Senator Mike Gravel urged the state and the federal
government to jointly study the feasibility of locating visitor
facilities in the south Denali area. In 1973, the Mount McKinley
National Park master plan recommended an expansion of the park
boundary to the south and a shift of visitor attention and facilities
to the south side. The 1975 Denali State Park master plan recommended
the addition of the Tokositna study area to the state park for
the development of visitor and recreation facilities. In 1976,
the state legislature added to the state park the land that comprises
the study area (Environmental Investigation and Site Analysis
– Tokositna, Denali State Park, 1980).
Following these two events, State Senator Patrick Rodey and Representative
Clark Gruening, with the strong support of Senator Gravel, sponsored
the passage of two appropriation bills in the 1978 legislature.
One bill appropriated $310,000 to the Alaska Department of Natural
Resources to investigate the feasibility of constructing a lodge
and visitor center complex at Tokositna, and the second bill appropriated
$85,000 to the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public
Facilities to study access to the area. These developments led
to a memorandum of understanding, signed in October 1978 by the
secretary of the U.S. Department of Interior, the governor of
Alaska, and the mayor of the Matanuska-Susitna Borough, to jointly
plan visitor facilities and programs in Denali State Park (Environmental
Investigation and Site Analysis – Tokositna, Denali State
Park, 1980).
In May 1979, the state legislature set up the Tokositna Special
Committee, with Senator Gravel, State Senator Rodey, and Commissioner
of Natural Resources Robert LeResche as members. The purpose of
this committee was to provide direction for the Tokositna project.
The vision for this project was a major, year-round tourism and
recreation destination that included commercial lodging and a
variety of other facilities and services; various outdoor recreation
activities including alpine skiing; campgrounds; trailheads; an
airstrip; and a Teflon dome enclosure to house many of these facilities.
Four reports were produced that deal with the feasibility of developing
major recreation facilities at Tokositna: 1) Environmental Investigation
and Site Analysis; 2) Market Analysis and Economic Study; 3) Downhill/cross-country
Ski and Outdoor Recreation Study; and 4) Transportation Study.
The Environmental Investigation and Site Analysis (1980) analyzed
key environmental information about the physical aspects of the
Tokositna area. The Market Analysis/ Economic Feasibility Study
(1979) analyzed the potential in-state and out-of-state visitor
use demand. The Skiing Feasibility Analysis (1979) passed a positive
judgement on the feasibility of skiing in the south Denali area:
“Based upon the scope and quality of terrain the tentatively
selected site compares favorably with other successful ski resorts
in the U.S., Canada and Europe” (Sno Engineering 1979, p.2).
Disadvantages included high development and operating costs, sensitive
environmental and wilderness values, conflict with existing mining
claims, and unproved technologies with regard to the Teflon dome
enclosure.
The ‘80s: Site Proposals
These studies were followed by a series of site proposals. In
1980 the Alaska Division of Parks and the NPS proposed facilities
at the Tokositna site. In 1986 the Denali National Park and Preserve
General Management Plan proposed cooperative state, federal, and
private development of a visitor center/hotel complex on South
Curry Ridge (ADNR and NPS 1986). The plan calls for the development
of visitor services and access to the South Denali region to take
advantage of the area’s dramatically sculptured landscapes
and mountain-oriented recreational opportunities, and recommends
the project be planned and developed cooperatively with the state
of Alaska and with involvement from the private sector.
Three years later the 1989 Denali State
Park Master Plan proposed a facility for High Lake in the
north end of Denali State Park (ADNR 1989; ADNR 1990). The Master
Plan recommends facility construction in the South Denali region
because, “Tremendous views of the Mt. McKinley massif and
the diversity of surrounding areas make the park an appropriate
location for a ‘South Denali Visitor Complex’. The
visitor complex will provide a focal point and staging area for
the Denali State Park interpretive program.”
The ‘90s
In 1990 CIRI proposed a facility about a mile south of the Talkeetna
townsite. Most proposals were rejected because they weren’t
accessible by road and railroad. Only two points on the main highway
system in the south side area offer both railroad access and a
good view of Mount McKinley – High Lake and Talkeetna. High
Lake was rejected after considerable public opposition and after
it was determined to be only marginally feasible for hotel development.
In October 1990 the Senate Appropriations Committee directed
the National Park Service to address visitor facility development
in Talkeetna, Denali State Park, and on the south side of Denali
National Park. The 1991 report in response to the directive from
the Senate Committee on Appropriations concluded that the CIRI
site for a Talkeetna Visitor Center would be suitable and economically
feasible (DOI NPS 1991).
In 1993, the National Park Service published a Draft South Slope
Denali Development Concept Plan/Environmental Impact Statement
that proposed two visitor centers: one in Talkeetna on CIRI-owned
land, and one along the Parks Highway. The 1993 draft plan did
not resolve the controversial issues, so in 1994 at the request
of Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt, a Denali Task Force
was established to make recommendations on, among other matters,
the cooperative management and recreation development of Denali’s
south side. The task force submitted its final report to the National
Park System Advisory Board in December 1994, and the report’s
recommendations for the south side were adopted by the advisory
board without modification (Denali Task Force 1994).
In 1995 the Alaska Visitors Association (AVA) proposed a tram
to Alder Point to access south Denali. The AVA recommended further
study of a 2-stage aerial tramway at Alder Point extending from
the south end of Denali State Park several miles toward, and into,
Denali National Park.
In May 1995, south side planning was reinitiated cooperatively
by an intergovernmental planning team. Governor Tony Knowles directed
the state to take a lead role in this cooperative effort to increase
recreation and tourism opportunities on the south side of Denali.
The cooperative planning team was comprised of representatives
from the National Park Service, State of Alaska, Denali Borough,
Matanuska-Susitna Borough, and two Native regional corporations
(Ahtna, Inc., and Cook Inlet Region, Inc.). One component of this
cooperative endeavor was the preparation of a 1997 South Side
Development Concept Plan/Environmental Impact Statement (DCP/EIS).
The purposes of the DCP/EIS were to:
Provide opportunities for high quality, resource-based destination
experiences and provide information, orientation, and recreation
services and facilities convenient to park visitors.
Develop facilities and access in a location and manner that minimizes
impacts on resources, local lifestyles, and communities.
Establish working partnerships for funding and phasing development.
Provide access to and a location for interpretation of the special
qualities found in Denali National Park and Preserve and Denali
State Park, including access to the spectacular alpine landscape
on the south side of the Alaska Range.
Offer a range of experiences and opportunities to meet the diverse
needs of the traveling public, including information and orientation
to the region, and new or improved recreation facilities.
Ensure that, viewed as a whole, facilities and services benefit
all visitors, including Alaska residents, independent travelers,
and package tour travelers.
Design and develop facilities and access improvements to support
public use and understanding of the south side and its outstanding
resources.
Establish a research program and identify management needs to
guide facility and road development.
Facilitate orderly economic development in the region consistent
with resource protection.
Minimize and mitigate adverse effects on fish and wildlife resources,
habitat, cultural resources, local rural quality of life, and
existing public land and resource uses, including subsistence
uses.
Establish methods, responsibilities, and necessary steps to control
unwanted secondary impacts of tourism and to minimize conflicts
between different visitor groups.
In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969,
as amended, the National Park Service was the lead federal agency
responsible for the DCP/EIS; the state and the two boroughs were
cooperating agencies. The two Native corporations could not serve
as cooperating agencies under the National Environmental Protection
Act, but were considered planning partners pursuant to ANCSA (P.L.
92-203, Sec. 2(b) and in accordance with National Park Service
policy and the Federal Advisory Committee Act.
The revised draft DCP/EIS was filed with the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) in March 1996 and the final was filed with the EPA
in January 1997. The selected alternative in the final DCP/EIS
provides for enhanced access and recreational opportunities throughout
the south Denali region for a variety of visitors, including Alaskans,
independent travelers, and package tour travelers, while at the
same time protecting the important resource and community values
in the area, including the rural lifestyle of local residents.
The DCP/EIS plans visitor facilities for the Tokositna area at
the western edge of Denali State Park near the end of an upgraded
and extended Petersville Road; in the central development zone
of Denali State Park along the George Parks Highway; at Chelatna
Lake; and in the Dunkle Hills. Developments would include a visitor
center, parking, up to 50 campsites, a picnic area, hiking trails,
information and safety signage, and associated facilities.
The 1997 Record
of Decision (ROD) for the DCP/EIS commits the NPS to take
all practicable measures to avoid or minimize adverse environmental
effects that could result from implementation of the selected
action. These measures include conducting cooperative research
on the natural and cultural resources and human uses on the south
side; protecting sensitive wildlife habitat and activities; protecting,
to the extent practicable, wetlands and vegetation; implementing
best management practices to protect water quality and surface
water resources; implementing measures to reduce soil loss; implementing
measures to reduce the potential for human/wildlife conflicts;
protecting archeological and historic resources, as necessary;
and incorporating sustainable design principles and aesthetics
into facility design and siting. Adverse environmental effects
also will be minimized by implementing additional land use controls
prior to major development and managing recreational and other
activities to protect south side resources.
At the same time, the Matanuska-Susitna Borough finalized the
Petersville Road Corridor Management Plan. One of the objectives
of the 1998 Matanuska-Susitna Borough Petersville
Road Corridor Management Plan (Maps) is to enhance the visitor
experience of Petersville Road in conjunctions with facility development
in the South Denali region. Recommendations include interpretive
panels, informational kiosks, vegetative buffers, and retention
of scenic qualities along the road corridor.
These planning processes relied heavily on public input; however,
portions of the 1997 plan remained controversial even after substantial
modifications were made to address public concerns. To address
implementation of the south side plan, in 1997 the Governor of
Alaska chartered the South Denali Citizens Consultation Committee,
which included representatives from south side communities and
interested user groups.
The 1999
South Denali Citizens Consultation Committee Final Report
recommended modifying the development concepts in the South Side
Denali Development Concept Plan while remaining consistent with
its goals and objectives: to provide resident and visitor facilities
throughout the south side of the Alaska Range to meet a wide range
of needs and interests of the region’s diverse user groups.
The committee recommended that a nature center be constructed
within the Denali State Park boundary and avoid an extensive upgrade
of the Petersville Road through the canyon, thereby minimizing
impacts to mining and backcountry uses.
The 2000-2001 Denali
National Park Business Plan offers south Denali development as
the long-term solution for an alternative tourist destination
to Denali National Park and Preserve: “The area offers beautiful
views of Mount McKinley and the Alaska Range, glaciers, streams,
and much of the impressive array of wildlife for which the Denali
Park Road is famous. This alternative visitor destination would
be created through partnerships with the state, local communities,
and native corporations.”
TODAY
The National Park Service received a fiscal year ’04 Congressional
appropriation to develop facilities in the South Denali region,
and a Notice of Intent to prepare a South Denali Implementation
Plan was published in the Federal Register in February 2004.
Click here for the Scoping
Newsletter published in February, 2004.
Click here for the Study
Area Map considered during the first phase of the
public scoping process.
|